Ohhh, those 1980-81 Topps hockey scratch-off pucks. They still rankle hockey card collectors far and wide, more than 40 years after the set was released. But here's a message to those rankled folks:
You have the O-Pee-Chee version.
There. I said it.
You see, O-Pee-Chee didn't place any scratch-off material on the pucks in their version of the set. And it was larger too, topping out at 396 cards compared to Topps' 264. So you've got all the clean, unscratched cards you want there.
And I'll absolutely take the Topps cards if no one else wants them. It has everything to do with the nostalgia factor.
If I were a young, unassuming, hockey-loving kid growing up in the States in 1980, I would have probably devoured this set with gusto. The scratch-off surface would have been a bonus, not a deterrent.
Who's that player? Lemme see! (Grabs a quarter and starts scratching.)
Back at that time, cards were still fun things you bought in packs for 25 cents. You'd open the wax wrapper, chew the stick of gum, flip through the cards, and then what? Sort them by number or team, assemble them into a stack, and stick them in a drawer or a shoebox. You might even rubber band them.
Simple.
And listen, with 10 cards per pack, would I have lost enthusiasm to scratch every card after a couple of packs? Probably. But that's okay, too. The set is still a fun one. And now that I've said my piece, let's get to the cards. Scratch-offs aside, I think you'll find that it's a pretty solid set.
First things first:
Please rise and remove your helmets for the playing of our national anthems.
O Canada! Our home and native land...
O say, can you see, by the dawn's early light...
Speaking of O say, can you see, perhaps the coolest thing Topps did in this set was to honor the US Olympians from the recent Miracle on Ice team by applying a USA hockey stamp to their cards. That would have provided even more excitement for a hockey-loving kid growing up in the US back then. (How big was the US Olympic victory? Even O-Pee-Chee, a Canadian company, added the USA hockey stamp to those specific cards in their set.)
You know what else must have been cool? Finding these cards featuring goalies in their classic white masks and brown leather pads.
Bonus: Goalies sporting the towel tuck.
There's plenty of action captured in this set as well. Check out those five skaters zooming around Rangers goalie John Davidson. He's ready for the onslaught, though.
On the subject of action, let's talk about the design of these cards. The diagonal team bar across the bottom helps show motion and energy, which is fitting for the sport of hockey. And whether you like the scratch-off idea or not, the hockey puck shape is fun.
Then you have the thin colored border around the card, which sometimes matches
the team colors (Bruins yellow, Canadiens red, Flyers orange), and other times doesn't (Black
Hawks green, Whalers purple, Flames green). But that's no big deal here. The colors are
bright and fun. You get those magentas and cyans and oranges and
yellows.
You've got some big rookies in this set as well. From left to right, there's Mike Gartner, Ray Bourque, and Michel Goulet. I'm pretty happy that all three of these guys have unscratched pucks, as well as the second-year Wayne Gretzky card at the top of this post.
You know what else I like? Classic hockey jerseys. You already saw some of them earlier in this post, but I'll reiterate with the six cards here: Those are some fantastic designs. (Even Vancouver's "flying V" design is great in its awfulness.) They're so fantastic, in fact, that over the past few years many of them have made comebacks in one form or another during special retro game nights around the NHL.
One downside to the set would be the airbrushed cards. For Billy Harris (left) and Dave Lewis (middle), it was
bad enough that they were traded away from the New York Islanders right before
the team would win four straight Stanley Cups. But now they're also
airbrushed into Kings uniforms? Robert Picard (right) seems to think
that's a little cruel and unusual. And I'd agree.
A second downside, some might say, would be the lack of a player name on the card back. But if the player name did appear on the back, there'd be no reason to have the scratch-off material covering up the name on the front.
As for colors, the green text on a dark yellow background isn't the best for readability, but it isn't the worst either. So it's fine. Besides, there are some nice cartoons to be found throughout the set.
Now let's get to the subsets.
There were some record breaker cards to start things off, including a couple of records set by youngsters. (Bourque's record was most points by a rookie defenseman, 65.)
Players named as first-team and second-team all-stars received a separate card in the set to go along with their base card. Check out the design on the back. Although sparse, I really like it. Who else hears the sound of wooden stick on puck?
There were two types of checklists included in the set: a team leaders card (front and back shown) that included each player's position and uniform number, and then a standard checklist. The standard checklists did not receive the scratch-off treatment, but all of that material covering the team card more than made up for it!
In the middle of the set, you had the typical group of league leader cards. Got to love the penalty minute leaders. How about these season totals: Jimmy Mann 287 PIM, Dave Williams 278 PIM, Paul Holmgren 267 PIM.
The final three cards of the set documented some of the previous season's playoff action. I love that image of the Broad Street Bullies skating onto the ice as a team, looking like a pack of hungry wolves. Interstingly, these three cards also did not get the scratch-off treatment.
Finally, one team pin-up was included in
each wax pack. These paper inserts folded out to a size of about 4 x 7 inches.
Let's get back to the scratched vs. unscratched thing for a moment. Looking through all the cards above, you've noticed that some are scratched, and some are unscratched. That means I've completed this set in the most basic form. And I'm fine with that.
I'm not looking to immediately increase the difficulty by trying to assemble
an entire unscratched set, or anything. But I thought it would at least be beneficial to know how close I currently stand to that achievement. So I went through the binder, page by page, and tallied the scratched and unscratched cards. Here's the breakdown:
Scratched:130
Unscratched: 129
No coating: 5
In any case, scratch-offs aside, there's a lot to enjoy about this set. Fun colors, some nice-looking subsets, good cartoons, and classic uniforms.
What do you think about the 1980-81 Topps hockey set? Should I go for a fully unscratched set next?
Leave your thoughts in the comment section, and thanks for reading as always!
When I put my set together I went for the unscratched version. Not that I thought the cards were damaged because they were scratched, mostly because that is how they were issued out of packs. But I've always had the itch to try and build an unscratched version so you can see the whole card. Then pandemic pricing kicked in...
ReplyDeleteWow, nicely done on putting together an unscratched version! I just sent you a friend request on TCDB. Maybe we'll be able to help each other out in the future -- you for your scratched set, and me for my unscratched set.
DeleteI love the green on yellow card backs... and the idea behind the scratch-off to reveal the name. I actually think Topps (or Fanatics) should do this for a future baseball set (but not their flagship baseball). As for going for a fully unscratched set... it's your money, so I'll leave that up to you. If it were me, I probably would try. My OCD doesn't like mismatched things 😂
ReplyDeleteP.S. Congratulations on completing the set!
DeleteThanks very much, Fuji! I'm still thinking about putting together the unscratched set. But I agree that some form of scratch-off in a modern product would be cool.
DeleteI say go crazy and build both full sets scratched and unscratched.
ReplyDeletemake it a race to see which one crosses the finish line first. multi sporting
DeleteNot a bad idea, Johnny! That would certainly make it more entertaining.
DeleteThis is one of my favorite hockey sets. I collected this set as a kid and have both the scratched and unscratched sets. I remember the scratch offs being nearly irresistible to scratch off. Congrats on completing it.
ReplyDeleteBoth sets? That's excellent, Crocodile! I'm sure I would have scratched off quite a few cards if I'd opened packs when I was a kid, too.
DeleteTopps' decision to use scratch-offs on the front -- for the player name, no less! -- is baffling. I don't know if this was an attempt to attract more collectors to hockey cards, I know hockey and basketball didn't sell as well in the states during this time. ... Also, good for O-Pee-Chee.
ReplyDeleteIf only we could go back and listen in on some production meetings at the Topps office...
DeleteCongratulations on finishing that set! I have a few of the OPC cards from that year, including Gretzky (kind of lower grade), but nowhere near having the set. Those really do bring me back to my childhood in the early 80s in Canada when I played hockey and idolized those guys (I switched to being mainly a baseball fan in the late 80s, which is what stuck with me through to adulthood, but before that I had been all hockey....)
ReplyDeleteThanks very much, Sean! Glad these cards brought back some good hockey memories for you. I can only imagine what it was like growing up playing hockey in 1980s Canada.
DeleteNot really a fan of this set but it won't stop me from collecting it. Congratulations on completion!
ReplyDeleteThanks very much, Billy! There are some good Rangers cards for you to go after -- Esposito, Beck, Greschner, Davidson.
DeleteThis was the first hockey set I remember seeing. I didn't think the scratch off element was that bad. Congrats on completing the set!
ReplyDeleteThanks very much, Matt. That's quite an introduction to hockey cards for you!
DeleteHappy completed set! I think I said it back when I saw these for the first time in one of your other posts, but even though I've never collected hockey, I think that these were a very fun concept. I can see why the grading crowd doesn't like them, but their opinions on such things mean very little to me, so I'll be sticking to my original assessment... they're just neat!
ReplyDeleteThanks very much, Jon! And I agree. Fun concept, especially for the time period.
Delete