Sunday, November 30, 2025

Box Break: 1991-92 Score Canadian Bilingual, Series 2

Earlier this year, I shared a cool story about buying a couple of hockey wax boxes from a facebook marketplace member and receiving a third box for free. It was 1991-92 Score Canadian Hockey Bilingual (Series 1). And although that set wasn't anywhere near my radar for completion, the box got me close enough to provide all the motivation I needed. Within a couple of months, Series 1 was done and dusted.

Since then (and thanks to some encouragement from commenters), I've tossed around the idea of building Series 2. Sure, I could have just purchased the complete set and then added it to my finished Series 1 set, but I just didn't see the fun in that—especially because I built Series 1 myself.

And considering that Series 2 was only another 330 cards, and that wax boxes were readily available on sites like ebay for around $30, shipping included, it didn't take too long for me to make the decision.
 
 

Wax box acquired.
 
I've got to say, the nostalgia factor was higher than expected. It went up another few points once I opened the lid.

 
 

I'd forgotten about those wrappers. Even their plastic "trash bag" quality, which was a nuisance back then, made me happy somehow. 

You'll notice that all four wrappers feature Canadian teams, which is fitting for this Canadian version of the set. Series 2 had Calgary, Winnipeg, Québec, and Toronto. Series 1 wrappers featured the other three Canadian teams of the era: Vancouver, Edmonton, and Montreal. The fourth variant featured Pittsburgh, which I'd assume was chosen because they were the defending Stanley Cup champs going into that season. 

So, did I dig right in and voraciously open all the packs in one sitting, hoping to find all the big stars of the era or one of the Bobby Orr insert cards?

No.

I thought it would be much more fun to open them gradually. So, on a rainy weekend morning, or if I wanted a little break from work during the week, I'd open a pack. Or three.

Here's how it often went:

 
"Time to take a quick break and open a pack."
 
Takes box off shelf, takes a pack out, and opens it.
 
"Nice. Let's do one more."
 
Takes another pack out. Opens it.
 
"Nice. Okay, back to work."
 
Five minutes pass.
 
"Who am I kidding? Let's open another one."
 

I don't think I ever opened more than four in one sitting, though. And it was a worthwhile endeavor, for sure. Knowing I had a little reprieve was good for the collecting soul, especially since I'd also be building a set in the process.

In my first pack, I found a Sergei Fedorov card and a Mike Modano card back-to-back, which was a great start. Soon after, though, it seemed like collation might be an issue. Some packs contained at least of few of the same cards, in the same consecutive order. But I didn't let that bother me too much.

It's largely because just like Series 1, there's some good carboard to be found in Series 2.

Look here:



So I kept opening packs, the weeks went by, and the stack of cards kept growing taller. Eventually, I neared the last pack and started collating, wondering how close I'd come to the complete set. Here's a reminder of how the numbers crunch:

15 cards per pack x 36 packs = 540 total cards
 
Series 2 = 330 total cards (#331–660)

As long as the number of duplicates could stay under 210, and as long as I found at least one copy of each card in the set, I'd get there.

How close did I come?
 
Here's the final result of sorting, in stacks of 70, 100, 100, and 60:



Looks like a pretty good amount of cards in each stack, right? So what are the results? And how many duplicates did I accumulate? 



Card Range

Number of Unique
Cards Obtained

Number of
Duplicates

330–400

70/70

46

401–500

100/100

95

501–600

93/100

36

601–660

60/60

40

TOTAL

323/330

217



Impressive! 

If you're familiar with Score products from the late '80s and early '90s, you'll know that their collation across packs and boxes left a lot to be desired. But this box was certainly different. I only need 7 more cards to complete Series 2!

For my Series 1 build, the numbers were skewed much more toward duplicates. I needed 43 cards to complete the set instead of 7, and I had 253 duplicates instead of 217.
 
In any case, I'm sure some folks on TCDB will be happy to rid themselves of a few junk wax cards in a trade. I should have Series 2 finished in no time.
 
For now, here are a few more well-designed cards to whet your appetite for the set completion post:



Oh, and now for the big, dramatic moment.

Did I pull a Bobby Orr autograph?

         
                    |
                    |
                    |
                    |
                    |
                    |
                    |
                    |
                    V


                   No.


Did I at least pull one of the non-autographed inserts?


                    |
                    |
                    |
                    |
                    |
                    |
                    |
                    |
                    V


                   No.


(Sad Trombone)


That surprised me a little. Would have been fun to pull one. 

Despite that, the whole experience was fantastic. Opening up a bunch of packs and collating a set by hand brought back a lot of fun childhood memories. And for only $30 or so, it was totally worth it. 

I guess you can say it's one of the positives of the junk wax era. Here we are, 30+ years later, and you can still buy a sealed wax box at an affordable price and try to build a set.

Stay tuned for set completion.


Now here are two questions for you readers and collectors:

When was the last time you opened an entire box of cards with the goal of putting together the complete set?

If there's a junk wax set out there that you'd consider building in this "old-fashioned" way, which set would it be?

Share in the comment section, and thanks for reading along!

12 comments:

  1. A. I opened some 2023 and 2024 Topps Costco boxes in an effort to build those sets, but they were much smaller than a hobby box. I'd have to do some digging to figure out the last time I opened up a standard 24 or 36 pack box in an effort to build the set. Off the top of my head, I'd say 1991 Fleer baseball. Opened up two boxes, but collation was really, really bad.

    B. The only way I'd go out of my way to build a Junk Wax Era set the old fashioned way is if I found super cheap wax boxes at a flea market. I have a bunch of sets I'm currently working on already, so to add another one to my plate right now isn't a high priority.

    C. Sorry you didn't pull an Orr. I think it's pretty cool that Score broke down that 6 card insert set across the three different versions of their 1991-92 hockey products.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A. Collation back in the early '90s was often bad, for sure. And 1991 Fleer on top of that? Ouch.
      B. Here's hoping you'll find a $5 box of 1990 Bowman, or something like that!
      C. Yeah, I was really thinking I'd find one Orr card in that box. Maybe I'll open a random pack at some point in the future and find one in there.

      Delete
  2. 9P send me your list as well what I asked the last time that I commented on if I were to remake another JW era set again probably go for none except I might do 1 of my least sports like basketball or football maybe hockey knowing that I could find something to have a 2nd or 3rd set of something the last time I opened something hoping for a complete set from basically everything under 300 cards in the set

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, it's much easier to build a full set if the total is only 300 cards. Or if it's an early Upper Deck set, you could try to build just the low series or the high series.

      Delete
  3. Oh those wrappers ... Not nearly as fun or as easy to open as the wax pack wrappers, though they didn't leave wax (or gum) stains.

    Last box I bought to try to complete the set was 2024 Topps Heritage. It's impossible to complete a set off of one box these days but I did eventually complete it. Last box of a junk wax set I bought was probably the 1991 Pro Set MusiCards -- the U.K. version -- about seven years ago. I think I came one card short of completing it from that box.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Got to hand it to Score to try something different with the wrappers, right? As for the MusiCards set, pretty cool that you were one card away from completing the set. Do you still need that one card?

      Delete
  4. If I could find a box of junk wax for about $50, I'd love to try and complete another set the old fashion way!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keep your eyes peeled for cheap boxes, Matt! It was a fun experience. Totally worth it. (And if you do try it, I hope you'll post the results on your blog.)

      Delete
  5. It's been so long since I tried to complete a set by hand. It may have been the late 90s when there was quality Star Trek, Star Wars, and X-Files sets out there. My brother did get me a box of 1987Topps a couple of Christmases ago, so we'll see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ooh, opening up a box of 1987 Topps would be epically nostalgic. (Although you'd have to open more than 36 packs to even get to the 792 card total.) But keep an eye out for cheap boxes, maybe from the late '90s like you said. It's a lot of fun.

      Delete
  6. I'm waaay too familiar with the purple-bordered US edition but the light blue bilingual set feels new to me. Nice to see a "junk wax" hockey set box rip in 2025.

    A couple years ago I bought a couple boxes of early '90s sets to complete the old fashioned way. Mostly 1993 baseball and football. If you're counting the "Junk" era as 1987-1993, there isn't much left that interests me. Maybe 1993 Topps baseball/football, or 1992-93 Topps Hockey.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did you end up completing those 1993 sets the old-fashioned way? I think 1992-93 Topps hockey would be a nice one to try. (Although it's a pretty big set at 529 cards!)

      Delete