A collecting memory just crossed my mind.
When I was in middle school, back around 1990, I remember coming up with a hypothetical question for my stepbrother. He was a few years younger than me, but we had some common interests for sure, like watching baseball, playing Wiffle ball in the backyard, and collecting cards.
Here's the question I asked him:
Imagine you had a tree in your backyard that produced packs of trading cards instead of fruit. As long as you only took one pack from the tree each day, it would produce more packs indefinitely. But if you took any additional packs that day, it would turn into a normal tree, never to produce cards again.
Would you be able to follow that one rule?
Unfortunately I don't remember my stepbrother's exact answer, but I think the gist of it was that he would take as many packs from the tree as he could in one day, even if it meant he wouldn't get any more after that. (He was only about 7 or 8 years old at the time. Can't blame him for that response. After all, if it was a big tree in full bloom, there would have probably been hundreds of wax packs ripe for plucking.)
In any case, the question provides a fun little exercise in willpower analysis. And I suppose it takes on different flavors if you get more specific with the packs.
For example, if all the packs were 1956 Topps baseball, I think some collectors would be pretty tempted to grab as many as they could on the first day.
1991 Fleer, on the other hand? That tree might be flourishing for a lonnnnng time.
What if the packs first blossomed as junk wax, but as they "ripened", they became more and more vintage? Would you have patience then? I bet you would. (And I bet you'd see at least a few other collectors down at the local garden supply store looking for saplings.)
I haven't gone so deeply into all this until now, but it's definitely fun to expand on the idea.
So let's go back to the time when I asked my stepbrother that question. Baseball cards were having quite a boom. The Score company joined the scene in 1988. A year later the Bowman brand returned. And of course Upper Deck made a big splash that same year with their iconic 1989 set and the Ken Griffey, Jr. rookie card.
Oh, and don't forget some of the famous (or infamous) error cards that had us all talking.
I look back at that era with a tremendous amount of fondness.
So how about you readers and fellow collectors?
(1) Which wax pack sapling (year, brand, and sport) would you buy and plant first?
(2) Could you maintain the "one wax pack per day" rule once that tree started bearing fruit?
Share in the comment section. I'm interested to read your answers!


9P I would like the Saparius circa 1967 that I would pluck 1 a day as long it stayed in bloom until I finished the set then bloom something different to complete other sets that have been hard to completing
ReplyDeleteGood choice, sir. I think the '67 pack wrappers would look good in full bloom.
DeleteI'd start with my collecting roots and pick 1977 Topps Star Wars, but if I had to pick something sports related... I'd go with 1981 Topps baseball. I would definitely follow the one wax pack per day rule and slowly build either of those sets.
ReplyDeleteOoh, nice choice, Fuji. I think some of your neighbors would be interested in taking a closer look at such a rare species of tree.
DeleteI would like it to be a random variety of baseball, basketball, football and hockey with a different variety added every day. I could definitely hold to the one pack a day habit. It's one more than I do now because I haven't bought a pack in a few years. I would also like it to grow and bear fruit the day after it was planted, bear a pack every day and never die. Cool idea!
ReplyDeleteWe can call it "the sampler tree". Maybe the packs it produces will depend on the season. (e.g., more hockey packs in the winter, and more baseball packs in the summer.)
DeleteThat's tough, but I would probably go with something like 1972 Topps baseball. I think I could stick to the one pack a day rule fairly easily, but I guess there would be only one way to find out. This is a very fun idea!
ReplyDeleteCan't go wrong with '72, my friend! The white/blue/orange colors of the pack wrapper would make for a nice-looking tree, as well.
DeleteOnly if the tree housed cedar waxwings.
ReplyDeleteHah! You win the comment section today, Billy. Great to see you here.
DeleteSeeing as how I'd end up with 365 packs a year, I could easily limit myself to 1 a day! As for picking a particular pack, I suppose a valuable set like 1952 Topps would allow me to not only complete an iconic set but get rich selling off the extras!
ReplyDeleteYou're a shrewd businessman, Matt. Just make sure to keep that tree nice and healthy!
DeleteI'd probably start with 76 Topps, the year of my birth and go a pack a day til I eventually complete the set. Otherwise, do what Matt typed, get those 1952s and make a killing selling off the extras!
ReplyDeleteMaybe Matt can provide you with a couple of seeds from his 1952 tree. He's a nice guy ;-)
DeleteI'd probably start with 1980 Topps baseball, then let all of the fruit bloom and age. Then once all the 'fruit' fell off the tree I'd pick up all the packs. Then hopefully as the tree ages more and more vintage would be produced.
ReplyDeleteInteresting thought, sir! One must have patience, and must take care of the tree for years before the real vintage packs are produced.
Delete